Sunday, October 27, 2013

Israeli nationality – there’s no such animal

A lot of religious and nationalist sewage has flowed through the state of Israel’s streams since its establishment…

Salman Masalha ||
Israeli nationality – there’s no such animal

Everyone will no doubt agree that Israel is not a normal country. Perhaps it is also one of the funniest countries in the world. This is because there’s no other country that flees as though the house were on fire from defining its inhabitants as belonging to it in the sense of nationality. Recently the Supreme Court went so far as to emphasize in a ruling that “the existence of an Israeli nationality has not been proven by objective criteria.” Therefore the court rejected the petition by the Ani Yisraeli (I Am an Israeli) non-profit organization to register the Israeli nationality in the Population Registry.

The court based its ruling, inter alia, on the pillars of Zionism: “The perception that Judaism is not only a religious affiliation but also a national affiliation is a foundation stone of Zionism,” in the language of Justice Uzi Vogelman. In this, the justice sharpens the contradiction between Zionist nationalism, which has been around for 100 years, and the Jewish religion, which is thousands of years old. Vogelman also emphasized, rightly, that “an individual cannot belong to two nationalities.” Indeed, a person is born into a certain nationality and he cannot change it whenever he wants to.

Taking this healthy logic one step further leads to a far-reaching conclusion: A person who belongs to the Japanese, Russian or Ethiopian nationality, say, cannot simultaneously belong to another nationality. This also applies if Russians or Ethiopians, say, convert to Judaism. They will continue to belong to their nationality of origin – only with a new religion, recognized by the rabbis and nothing more. Is this not so?

The Supreme Court justices enlisted the Arabic public in order to justify their rejection of the petition: “Rather than including the Arab minority from the perspective of nationality, official or even unofficial adoption of the concept of ‘the Israeli nation’ is liable to exclude it from the perspective of citizenship … In the Arab public many will refrain from, or even explicitly reject defining themselves as Israelis because of the ‘lack of national neutrality’ in this denomination, or simply for political reasons.” The honorable justices did not bother to go to the Arabs and ask them. Instead, they preferred to cite “Arab” names like Yakobson and Rubinstein.

However, this question had already come up in the early days of the state of Israel. Back then there were strictly kosher “pure” and “native” Arabs who spoke explicitly about their belonging to “the Israeli nation.” We are told this by poet Rashid Hussein, a member of Mapam (the United Workers Party, originally Marxist-Zionist in orientation and the precursor of today’s Meretz party).

In an article from the 1950s, he reports on a Jewish-Arab peace conference that took place in Vienna in 1952. There, the Arab writer Emil Habiby stood at the conference podium and declared: “There are not two nationalities in Israel, there is only the Israeli nation … Since the two languages, Hebrew and Arabic, come from a single source, and since the two people, the Arab and the Jewish, come from a single source, and since the Jewish people, that is, the Children of Israel, are the majority, the inhabitants of Israel – Jews and Arabs – should be called by the name: the Israeli nation.”

Opponents to Habiby’s view were Zionists on the one hand and Arabs on the other. “On that day,” continued Hussein in his report, “a well-known Zionist, stood up to refute Habiby’s remarks entirely and declared that in Israel there are two nationalities: Arab and Jewish.” Moreover, Hussein, the man from Mapam, mocked Habibi, the man from Maki (the Communist Party of Israel): “On that day the Arab delegates agreed with the Zionist representative and rejected Habiby’s remarks.”

A lot of religious and nationalist sewage has flowed through the state of Israel’s streams since its establishment. It seems that today there is a wall-to-wall consensus regarding the denial of Israeliness, both among the Jews and among the Arabs. “Israeli” as a nationality exists only in English, in the passport the state issues to its citizens. In Hebrew and in Arabic there is no such animal.
Published: Opinions-Haaretz, October 27, 2013
For Hebrew, press here


Facebook comments:
Post a Comment

Middle East
  • The Arab world's quagmire

    Only a society that can engage in introspection and self-examination can emerge from its dark past and march confidently to a different future. Otherwise, it will continue to sink into the same marshy swamp.

    Read more

    A Feeble Middle East

    The West learned on its own flesh that this region conducts itself by other codes. Iran has continued to entrench its standing by means of its religious ideology. The toppling of Saddam Hussein shattered the illusion of the existence of a unifying “Iraqi identity” and gave an encouraging shot in the arm to Iran, which is forging ahead.

    Read more

  • The decay in the Arab world

    With great sadness, it can be said that in the absence of a sane civil alternative, the Arab world will continue along this path.

    Read more

    Neither Arab nor Spring

    The vicissitudes that have, for some reason, been collectively dubbed the "Arab Spring" are neither Arab nor Spring. One can say that they are actually living proof of the identity crisis and reverberating bankruptcy of Arab nationalism.

    Read more

  • another title

Israel - Palestine
  • Our troubles come from us

    And so we have reached a situation in which every Arab is concerned with his own problems and everyone talks about what preoccupies him personally – that is, his own troubles.

    Read more

  • Never-ending tragedy

    The Israeli right, in all its forms, wants exclusively Jewish control over all of the Land of Israel. To the Palestinians who live in this space, it promises residency – temporary, of course, on condition that they keep their heads down, accept their designated status and behave accordingly.

    Read more
  • Solomon’s Mosque

    Religion, every religion, is the No. 1 enemy of nationalism. But under conditions of tension, such as tribal warfare, these polar opposites combine into a toxic soup that consumes all common sense.

    Read more

  • They see not, nor know

    The term "neutralize" is very popular with people who have served in the security and expulsion forces. The question to be asked is, What did the poet who spoke of "neutralization" mean in this plan?

    Read more

    For Jews only

    From the moment the pundits followed in the footsteps of the politicians, both large and small, they carried this noxious melody everywhere. They were part of legitimizing the illegitimate in Israeli politics.

    Read more

  • With yearning soul

    The Zionism that aspired to establish a "Jewish home" in the Jews' "ancient homeland" did not take into consideration the fact that the land was not empty. It thus adopted the principle of population transfer, based on the same ancient biblical tradition.

    Read more

    Rabbis of the Dry Bones

    Racism surfaces when a society loses its self-confidence and turns to seeking ways to defend itself against what is different and perceived as increasingly threatening.

    Read more

  • الحلم

    أنّي في سجن جدران بيضاء
    حيث لا يعرفني أحدٌ، وأصواتٌ
    تختفي في الرّدهات، وأضواء تستنشقُ
    جمجمتي اللّاهثة.
    تتمة الكلام

Press photo to Email



Site Archive


  • The pit and the pendulum

    In those days, we did not drink four goblets of wine, because everything that gladdens the human heart is not a part of our custom.

    Read more

  • Welcome Back to History

    Islam, like other imperialist ideologies, still needs enemies to flourish. Enemies have served Islam in the past as fuel for its wagons. Without enemies Islam declines and stagnates...

    Read more

  • another title

  • Balkrishna Sama

    Man Is God

    He who loves flowers, has a tender heart.
    he who cannot pluck their blooms,
    has a heart that's noble.

    Read more

  • Martin Niemöller

    First They Came

    First they came for the Communists
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a Communist.
    Then they came for the Socialist
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a Socialist.

    Read More

  • Salman Masalha

    The Song About the Child

    Boston Gospel Choir

    Text: Salman Masalha
    Composer: Stephen Feigenbaum